Cornell Program on Applied Demographics
In cooperation with the New York State Data Center

Menu

Background and priorities

External resources:

Background

Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs) are non-overlapping, statistical geographic areas that partition each state or equivalent entity into geographic areas containing no fewer than 100,000 people each. They cover the entirety of the United States, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The Census Bureau defines PUMAs for the tabulation and dissemination of decennial census and American Community Survey (ACS) Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) data. Additionally, the ACS and Puerto Rico Community Survey use them to disseminate their respective period estimates.

The delineation of new PUMAs occurs after the completion of the decennial census as part of a program involving the State Data Centers (SDCs). Decennial census population counts and updated census tracts are critical inputs into the delineation process.

Criteria

The Census Bureau lists the following criteria for a PUMA:

  • 2020 Census tracts are used to build PUMAs
  • A PUMA contains at least 100,000 population according to Census 2020 population counts
  • A PUMA is expected to contain at least 100,000 population throughout the decade. PUMAs can be combined if population drops below the threshold
  • PUMA containing more than 200,000 population should be split unless there is sufficient reason not to
  • A county that has tracts in multiple PUMAs must have at least 10,000 population in each PUMA-county intersection
  • PUMAs should be contiguous

Priorities

Beside the criteria, the Census Bureau lists also a number of recommended priorities for the delineation process:

  • Avoid splitting counties
  • Avoid splitting Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSA - Metropolitan/Micropolitan areas)
  • Avoid splitting towns, villages and urban areas
  • Avoid splitting American Indian territories

The New York State Data Center took those recommendations into consideration and created its own list of priorities

  • Avoid splitting the 10 economic regions/labor market regions (more a criterium than a priority)
  • Avoid splitting counties. Splitting counties negatively impacts formation of Place-of-Work and Migration PUMAs. These are special PUMAs that are used to code place-of-work and origin of a recent move. These special PUMAs are constructed from whole counties and whole PUMAs. Splitting counties has a negative impact on the number of these special PUMAs and will limit the flexibility of special tabulation on commuting and domestic migration.
  • Use 2010 PUMA boundaries to enable creating timeseries without breaks
  • Avoid splitting towns, villages
  • Avoid PUMAs that are in different areas of responsibilty of regional planning offices
  • It is best when PUMAs contain areas that have similar characteristics. In statistical terms: it is better to minimize variation within a PUMA and maximize variation between PUMAs.

Local stakeholders and others might have additional or different priorities.

Timeline

The Census Bureau asks the State Data Centers to submit their PUMA changes before January 31, 2022. Feedback from stakeholders can be handled until January 7'th to give the NY State Data Center time to finalize the submission.

Stakeholder involvement

The combination of criteria and priorities means that not all priorities can be addressed simultaneously. Choices have to be made.

The NY State Data Center is asking stakeholders for feedback. This can be feedback on the plans presented for each or the regions, feedback on the priorities, or any other questions or comments. It is also possible to attach your own preferred PUMA delineation in the feedback (see below). Please contact the State Data Center through PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Tract Equivalence Files

The Census Bureau developed an application on top of QGIS to help with all kinds of Geographic Partnership programs including PUMA delineation. This application is called GUPS and it can be downloaded from the Census Bureau PUMA 2020 information page.

One of the features is importing and exporting Tract Equivalence Files (TEF). This is a comma separated text file with each line representing on tract. Each line contains identifiers for the tract (State, County and Tract IDs) and also the PUMA ID and PUMA name this tract is assigned to.

The NY State wide Tract Equivalence File that puts the 2020 tracts as well as possible into the 2010 PUMA boundaries was used as a starting point for our process and can be downloaded here

How to use the regional information on this web page

When you click on the name of an economic region on the left you will be presented with one or maps with different PUMA configurations. The first map is a map of the starting point: the PUMA boundaries as they were during the last decade. Most browsers let you open the image of the map in a separate tab or window (either right click or press and hold) which allows for looking at the map in greater detail.

Each PUMA has a color: light orange when the population is below 100,000, red when the population exceeds 200,000 and blue when the population is between 100,000 and 200,000.

The PUMA labels indicate the PUMA ID and the 2020 population within that PUMA. Please note that the PUMA ID is subject to change and will be assigned after all delineation is completed. At that point the State Data Center will also suggest new names.

Many maps also include county boundaries and town/place boundaries. It is sometimes assumed that users of this web page are familiar enough with the area that they don't need all the labels.

Below each map is a description of changes that were made to derive this configuration and a short list of pros and cons. There is also an option to download the corresponding TEF so stakeholders can use that to import in GUPS and closely examine the configuration and manipulate.

At the bottom of each region page is a call for feedback and a mention of the configuration that will be suggested to the Census Bureau. This is subject to change as all feedback received by the State Data Center will be considered.

Capital District

Map 0: Using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same
  • Part of Albany County outside Albany City exceeds upper threshold of 200,000

Map 0: Using 2010 PUMA boundaries (Albany County)

Download Tract Equivalence File

Options (out of many):

  1. Leave current boundaries with motivation of keeping existing PUMA boundaries
  2. Add Colonie town and Cohoes City to Albany City (this would make this PUMA exceed 200,000 persons)
  3. Extend the Albany City PUMA into Colonie town to include Colonie village (7,781), which would just be enough to satisfy the 200,000 criteria
  4. Extend the Albany City PUMA into Colonie town to include Colonie village and other tracts towards Latham CDP

Send your comments to PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Without comments the NY State Data Center will NOT suggest any changes to the PUMA boundaries in the Capital District

Central NY

Map 0: Using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same

Send your comments to PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Without comments the NY State Data Center will NOT suggest any changes to the PUMA boundaries in the Central New York

Finger Lakes

Map 0: Using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same
  • PUMA 01000 (Orleans & Genesee County) fell below the threshold of 100,000 residents and needs to be changed
  • PUMA 01300 went from 107,458 population in 2010 to 102,365 and if that continues this PUMA will drop below 100,000 in the coming decade as well
  • PUMA 00905 is close to the 100,000 population threshold as well. Monroe County alternatives are addressed below

Alternative 1: Splitting PUMA 01300 (Wyoming & Livingston)

Download Tract Equivalence File
In this alternative PUMA 01300 (Wyoming & Livingston County) is split by the county lines. Wyoming is added to Orleans and Genesee County to create a larger PUMA and Livingston is added to Ontario and Yates County
ProCon
  • This configuration satisfies criteria
  • PUMA 01000 (Orleans & Genesee County) fell below the threshold of 100,000 residents and needs to be changed
  • The expanded PUMA 01400 is close to the upper bound of 200,000 people in a PUMA

Alternative 2: Reconfiguring counties outside Monroe

Download Tract Equivalence File
Wyoming County, Orleans and Genesee County form one PUMA. Ontario and Livingston County are put together in a second PUMA. Yates, Wayne and Seneca County form a third.
ProCon
  • The population in the 8 counties surrounding Monroe is better balanced
  • Yates County might have more in common with Seneca and Wayne than with Ontario and Livingston
  • All PUMAs outside Monroe county will be different from the 2010 configuration

Map 0: Monroe County using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same
  • PUMA 00905 is close to the 100,000 population threshold, while other PUMAs surrounding Rochester are well above the threshold
  • The four PUMAs outside Rochester have a total of 548,330 residents in theory it would be possible to split this area in five PUMAs

Alternative 1: Towns of Rush and Mendon added to PUMA 00905 to more evenly balance population

Download Tract Equivalence File
The towns of Rush and Mendon are added to tract 00905
ProCon
  • Population in PUMA 00905 is safe from dropping below threshold
  • Two PUMAs have been modified
  • The new PUMA 00905 is not compact

Alternative 2: increase number of PUMAs in Monroe County from 6 to 7

Download Tract Equivalence File
PUMAs 00906 and 00901 have been merged and split into three parts
ProCon
  • More PUMAs give allow more detailed custom tabulations
  • Two PUMAs have been modified
  • Penfield and Pittsford Towns have been split between PUMAs

Send your comments to PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Without comments the NY State Data Center will suggest alternative 2 for the counties surrounding Monroe and to leave the 2010 PUMA boundaries intact for Monroe County

Long Island

Jump to Nassau County

Jump to Suffolk County

Map 0: Nassau County using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same
  • The total population in Nassau County was 1,395,774 which theoretically would allow for 13 PUMAs instead of the 12 delineated currently

Map 0: Suffolk County using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same
  • Most PUMAs are nested within towns
  • There are two PUMAs with a population below 100,000
  • Two tract boundaries have changed such that they don't fall neatly within the 2010 PUMAs

Alternative 1: Adjusted PUMA boundaries in Huntington, Babylon and Islip Town

Download Tract Equivalence File
Small changes have been made in three towns (Huntington, Babylon and Islip Town), for more detail:
Assign split tract to PUMA with least population in Huntington Town (see detail)
Assign split tract to PUMA with least population in Babylon Town (see detail)
Moved Islandia village from one PUMA to the other in Islip Town (see detail)
ProCon
  • Small changes to existing PUMA boundaries
  • All PUMAs meet population thresholds
  • A few PUMAs are just above 100,000

Send your comments to PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Without comments the NY State Data Center will suggest to leave the 2010 PUMA boundaries intact for Nassau County and implement alternative 1 for the Suffolk County

Huntington Town, PUMA 2010 boundaries left TEF, Alternative 1 on the right (2010 PUMA boundaries in purple) TEF
Babylon Town, PUMA 2010 boundaries left TEF, Alternative 1 on the right (2010 PUMA boundaries in purple) TEF
Islip Town, PUMA 2010 boundaries left TEF, Alternative 1 on the right TEF

Mid-Hudson

Map 0: Using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same
  • There are two PUMAs in Westchester County exceeding the upper threshold of 200,000 residents
  • Just like in 2010, Putnam County does not have enough residents (97,668) for a PUMA corresponding with the county boundaries. The Censuss criteria dictate that at least 10,000 are added from another county.

Map 0: Putnam County using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same. Small county parts can be grandfathered.
  • Putnam County and Westchester County are combined when establishing Place-of-work and Migration PUMAs

Alternative 1: Add parts of Dutchess County to Putnam County

Download Tract Equivalence File
East Fishkill town (29,707 residents) and Pawling town (8,012 residents) are added to Putnam County to suffice the population criteria
ProCon
  • Population criteria are met
  • Westchester County is a Place of Work and Migration PUMA by itself
  • Putnam and Dutchess County are combined in a Place of Work and Migration PUMA

Map 0: Souther Westchester County using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same. Small county parts can be grandfathered.
  • PUMA 03106 (Yonkers City) and PUMA 03107 have more than 200,000 residents in 2020
  • PUMAs 03104, 03105 and 03107 have a combined resident count of 510,959. That is enough to create 4 PUMAs instead of the current 3.

Alternative 1: Reconfiguration of southern Westchester

Download Tract Equivalence File
Yonkers is kept as its separate PUMA. New Rochelle is split from PUMA 03107 and combined with Mamaroneck town and village into a new PUMA. To meet all the criteria White Plains is added the remainder of PUMA 03104.
ProCon
  • An additional PUMA will give more data.
  • One less PUMA with a population of more than 200,000
  • Break in PUMA continuity for the 3 PUMAs that are reconfigured into 4
  • One PUMA left over 200,000 but this configuration keeps Yonkers city intact

Send your comments to PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Without comments the NY State Data Center will suggest alternatives 1 for Putnam County (combining with parts of Dutchess) and for southern Westchester County (adding a PUMA but leaving Yonkers intact)

Mohawk Valley

Map 0: Using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same
  • Several counties are split creating one multi-county (Oneida, Herkimer, Otsego and Schoharie) place of work and migration PUMA

Alternative 1: Reconfigure PUMAs with less county splits

Download Tract Equivalence File
Schoharie County is combined with Montgomery and Fulton. Otsego County with Herkimer County and Oneida County is split into two PUMAs by narrowing the PUMA around Utica and Rome.
ProCon
  • Less county splits
  • This configuration creates three place of work/migration PUMAs instead of 2
  • All PUMAs in this region have been altered
  • This configuration is less useful for Oneida/Herkimer planning agency and less useful for Souther Tier 8 which include Otsego and Schoharie Counties

Send your comments to PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Without comments the NY State Data Center will suggest NOT suggest any changes to the PUMA boundaries in the Mohawk Valley

New York City

The New York City PUMA delineation will be done in cooperation with the New York City Department of planning. New PUMA maps are under development.

North Country

Map 0: Using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same

Send your comments to PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Without comments the NY State Data Center will NOT suggest any changes to the PUMA boundaries in the North Country

Southern Tier

Map 0: Using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same
  • PUMAs nest with Southern Tier Central and Southern Tier 8 Regional planning
  • PUMAs 02401 and 02402 have less than 100,000 residents
  • PUMAs 02202 and 02203 lost significant population between 2010 and 2020 and are at risk of passing the threshold of 100,000 in the coming decade
  • The part of Chemung County within PUMA 02402 is less than 100,000

Alternative 1: Combining the PUMAs with less than 100,000 residents

Download Tract Equivalence File
The 2 PUMAs with less then 100,000 residents have been combined and the other 4 PUMAs have not been altered
ProCon
  • Population criteria are met
  • The newly combined PUMA has many more residents than the other ones
  • PUMAs 02202 and 02203 lost significant population between 2010 and 2020 and are at risk of dropping below the threshold of 100,000 in the coming decade

Alternative 2: Add Tioga to the western Counties and include full remainder of Broome County with Chenango and Delaware

Download Tract Equivalence File
The old PUMA 02202 is split up. The part in Broome County is added to PUMA 02201 and Tioga County is split. The southern half is combined with PUMA 02401 to create a PUMA around Interstate 86 from just outside of Binghamton through Corning. The northern half of Tioga county is combined with PUMA 02402. One tract in Chemung County was also added to this northern PUMA to satisfy the condition that each county part has to have at least 10,000 residents.
ProCon
  • Population criteria are met
  • Population is more evenly distributed and risk of dropping below 100,000 is avoided
  • The configuration is less useful for the regional planning agencies
  • The resulting PUMAs are not very compact

Alternative 3: Reconfigure to keep 6 PUMAs

Download Tract Equivalence File
PUMAs are reconfigured with as highest priority to keep 6 PUMAs. Densily settled areas are kept intact as much as possible.
ProCon
  • Keeps 6 PUMAs
  • Multiple PUMAs at risk of population dropping below 100,000 over the coming decade
  • The configuration is less useful for the regional planning agencies

Send your comments to PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Without comments the NY State Data Center will suggest changes to implement alternative 2

Western NY

Map 0: Using 2010 PUMA boundaries

Download Tract Equivalence File
ProCon
  • Keeping PUMA boundaries the same
  • Erie County had 954,236 residents in 2020. Theoretically enough for 8 or 9 PUMAs where there are 7 now

Send your comments to PUMA2020feedback@cornell.edu

Without comments the NY State Data Center will NOT suggest any changes to the PUMA boundaries in Western New York